Quackery
The Theory of Everything, Theology

Why Jesus IS Yahweh, And Time is Not a Dimension

Okay, so I’ve worked it out extensively, and it would indeed be the case, Biblically, that Yahweh is fully Jesus is fully the Spirit. No true separation as in “three-in-one” like I’ve been considering. The distinctions between His manifestations have to do with dimensions and time — and I finally understand how He could be all three at the same time and still be just one “person,” how He could pray as Jesus to Himself as Father and be able to have a conversation with His different selves in “real-time,” how He could be in two planes of existence at once (the created and the uncreated). This is possible because the spiritual realm is beyond the limits of time, just as we as 3-dimensional beings are beyond the limits of the first two dimensions. I will therefore go into all the technical detail to try to explain further, though it may take several posts.

The charge has been made that in order for something to exist, it must exist in time. While this holds true for 3-dimensional time-space, it would not apply to a dimension beyond time-space. According to the Word of God, the Heavenly Domain is eternal (occupying “the fullness of time“) and occupies 4-dimensional space: height, length, breadth, and depth, where “depth” is the dimension beyond our physical perception (a hyperdimension).4d bible

What would such a dimension be like? Changeless, a constant present, an interminable now. God, in this instance, would view our temporal realm as though all events are happening simultaneously (all at once He’s communicating with Himself as Jesus, interacting with Himself as the Holy Spirit filling all of space-time, watching as I write this, and watching the very beginning of the universe).

So, in this regard, not all who perceive spiritual phenomena are delusional. Perhaps they have merely opened what the Eastern mystics refer to as “the Third Eye,” enabling them to perceive this higher dimension (of hyperdimensional space).

Regarding time: it is most definitely not the 4th dimension, not a fundamental property of the universe. This thinking has prevailed for over one hundred years, but is not what Einstein said in his works on Relativity. Einstein stated that X4 = ict. The 4th dimension is not time, rather ict. The concept that time is the 4th dimension has become a Pandora’s box for physicists with too many paradoxes to its name.

Time seems rather an emergent property of quantum entanglement, which is reinforced by the results of an experiment by Ekaterina Moreva, et al, which suggests that time is an emergent phenomenon from an expanding 4th dimension relative to the three spatial dimensions.

The first premise is that this 4th dimension is constantly expanding at a rate of c relative to any one spatial coordinate. It is also moving independently of the three spatial dimensions. The expansion of the 4th dimension can be considered like a 3-D sphere or balloon expanding. The expansion of the 4th dimension also sets the arrow of time. The second premise is that time is essentially a change of state of a photon, which is a carrier of energy; essentially matter riding the expanding 4th dimension.

These two premises explain a number of paradoxes in physics. For example, spooky-action-at-a-distance, or entanglement, is readily understood. If two photons are simultaneously emitted at a single 3-D spatial coordinate they also must share the same local in the 4th dimension. However, as the two photons diverge in the spatial dimensions, they always remain collocated in the 4th dimension, because as photons travel at c they also experience no passage of time. They simply do not age at all; therefore, always occupy the same position in the 4th dimension. This means when you measure or observe one of the photons you also change the state of the other entangled photon instantaneously, regardless of the 3-D spatial separation. Remember that the act of observing or measuring a photon collapses its probability wave in quantum mechanics.

A probability wave expands at a rate of c until it is observed or measured (forcing its collapse). At that point the “matter” that resided in the 4th dimension is transformed into its 3-D localized spatial dimensions. In the case of our two diverging photons, both are an expanding probability wave. Over the course of one second the wave front expands in the 3-D spatial universe in a spherical fashion with a radius of 3 X 108 m/s. There is equal probability of finding both photons at any one point on the skin of that imaginary sphere. While the probabilities that the two photons would be collocated on that 3-D sphere are infinitesimally small, they are collocated at a single local in the 4th dimension. The probability of two photons emitted from a common locality occupying the same position on the spherical wave front is approximately zero. They are infinitely more likely to have some degree of physical separation due to the huge number of Planck points that represent the skin of the wave front sphere.

Why is this important? Because all particles that experience thermal vibrations interact with photons (the transfer messenger of energy) and all photons reside in the 4th dimension, which is expanding and drives the random disorder we observe as chaos. How do we know the rate that the 4th dimension is expanding? The simple answer is that when a theoretical object propagates through 3-D space at c, its on-board clock stops (as per Relativity) and that would mean that the object is not moving with respect to the 4th dimension. However, an object at rest in 3-D space must be moving through the 4th dimension at a rate of c.

Juggling this seems a little difficult, but the important factor to consider is that what Relativity shows us applies in both the 3-D spatial dimensions as well as the 4th dimension. This is what it means when I say that the 4th dimension is expanding at a rate of c relative to a given 3D spatial set of coordinates.

* The supporting physics for this is nothing more than Einstein’s derivation dx4 / dt = ic.

Advertisements

About Quackzalcoatl

Phoneticist, Palindrologist, and freelance Sharknadologist. Inventor. Ruler of 2-acre lakes and small streams.

Discussion

17 thoughts on “Why Jesus IS Yahweh, And Time is Not a Dimension

  1. “This is possible because the spiritual realm is timeless”

    Does the 4th dimension exist now? 😉

    Posted by thejackelscolumn | 11 November, 2013, 6:16 am
    • Dude, I know what you’re getting at. Hahaha. I don’t know. The more I dig into it, I get the feeling no one seems to know exactly what this means. I think what the fourth dimension is, from this understanding, is an explanation of what exactly “time” is, and how it exists, so it kind of does prove that “time” is its own dimension, but in a way where spatial dimensions are separate from it. I can’t necessarily comprehend it, since my points of reference are all time-related, and our reality of existence requires it, but maybe at some point we’ll figure out how this is so.

      Posted by Quackzalcoatl | 11 November, 2013, 6:21 pm
      • Time would be applied to all dimensions, and all dimensions of Existence share the universal key frame of the instant of now. The other problem is that higher dimensions can’t exist without the lower dimensional values for the same reason, in analogy, as to why you can’t have a building with 5 floors without the 4 other floors below it. I think this video I post below might be of some help. Existence is an infinite volume and such a volume has no dimensional value as it has an infinite number of 0 dimensional points. Higher dimensions don’t occur in this volume until you have the emergence of at least a line to which is 1 dimensional. Higher dimensional values greater than 3+1 will have to be either folded or rolled up withing the fabric of the infinite volume or space-time. They would be extremely tiny of course. So here is that video I think you might enjoy:

        There is no 4th dimension:

        Posted by thejackelscolumn | 11 November, 2013, 7:46 pm
        • Right. Rethinking my terminology, “outside of time where time does not exist” is an incorrect understanding. What I should be saying is since time is characteristic of its own dimension, and involved with the dimensions we call time-space, then any subsequent higher dimension would be able to occupy or access all of time, “the fullness of time.”

          If you understand dimensionality as a series of concentric rings rather than the stories of a building, it makes more sense. The first three dimensions are under time (bound by the laws of time-based physics), the higher dimensions are over time (and governed by a different set of physical laws).

          Posted by Quackzalcoatl | 11 November, 2013, 9:45 pm
          • Time is really more of a statement of frames of reference. Think of existence as a VHS tape or movie that never ends to where every instance is a frame.. Here time has two aspects to it, and the 1st is that it’s every frame and the 2nd is the inertia (the playing of the movie).. Now in science, no-time is a state in which there is no inertia to where there is only a static blank state. Here there is no inertia of information or the processing of information (energy). In such a state there cannot be any existing galaxies, stars, atoms, or even conscious states of being as it would be as close to a state of nothing as you can get without there actually being nothing at all. Time is not really then an actual dimension in the physical sense, it’s just an aspect and property of the physical dimensions in the sense of their existence and their entropy.

            Also all of the dimensions occupy all of time. The second for example occupies all of our time as does the zero dimension. It’s all one thing, and we are just discussing different aspects of the same thing we call Existence. Could there be higher dimensional beings? Sure.. And no, a higher dimensional being wouldn’t be able to see all of time or interact with it giving these become individual curled up points in the fabric of space-time. Hence a 11 dimensional being would be subject to his own relative curled up point. And as we ourselves can’t experience the entirety of the 3D+1, neither could he experience the entirety of the 11 dimensions.

            Also, the 3D +1 would play a foundation to the physical laws of the higher dimensions giving they can’t exist without these lower dimensions. It’s all bound together in one system. This is why the super symmetry is the goal of modern science. And we are well on our way to reaching that goal. 🙂

            Posted by thejackelscolumn | 12 November, 2013, 12:34 am
            • I totally get what your saying, Jackel. Not an easy subject to always comprehend, for sure. There are a few more hypotheticals I want to look into on this, so I certainly appreciate your feedback on all of this. Good stuff!

              Posted by Quackzalcoatl | 13 November, 2013, 2:49 pm
  2. “According to Scripture, time is not part of the Heavenly Domain…”

    OK, I’ll bite: according to what scripture?

    Posted by john zande | 11 November, 2013, 9:49 am
    • Why, the ones written by the nomadic sheep herders of course.
      I have a lot more to add to this, but it will take a bit of fourth dimensional expansion to get to it all.

      Posted by Quackzalcoatl | 11 November, 2013, 4:35 pm
      • Wait up, wait up, wait up… before you get onto that, what scripture. I don’t recall ever seeing any definition of the astral plains.

        Posted by john zande | 11 November, 2013, 4:48 pm
        • If you combine all of the references to God and His dwelling place being eternal, such as:
          [Isaiah 57:15, Isaiah 46:10, James 1:17, Isaiah 43:13, Psalm 90:1-2, Proverbs 8:23, Psalm 93:2, Psalm 102:25-27, Jeremiah 10:10, 1 Timothy 1:17, Hebrews 9:14, Romans 1:10]

          And the four dimensions describing the spiritual temple in Ephesians 3:17-19

          And consider all the many references and descriptions of angels and heavenly hosts, which are scattered throughout, you begin to get a picture of what it might be, though it is beyond our points of reference. But the Scriptures are like that, a little here, a little there, like a code. Much of it seems to have another meaning than the plain narrative text. Like whoever wrote it is messing with us just to show how smart they are. Clever little JEPD bastards!

          Posted by Quackzalcoatl | 11 November, 2013, 6:07 pm
  3. I would comment, but that is above my head! Haha!

    Posted by James82 | 11 November, 2013, 9:51 am
  4. Why Jesus IS Yahweh,

    The only four words of this post worth a damn.
    I interpret this as an admission that Jesus was the murdering, megalomaniacal SOB from the Old Testament.

    Well done! And now you realise you worship a monster.
    Don’t you feel like a dick?

    Posted by Arkenaten | 12 November, 2013, 5:41 am
  5. This time issue is a real mind-boggler, but who knows, maybe some of my ideas could help explain some of the fundamentals.

    It seems to me, time is a measure of distance between objects or things ‘being’ , relative to those things in motion, a process of change and velocity, relative to their environment, that being ALL other objects or things ‘being’, those also being in motion and in processes of change.

    The material universe is one enviroment, and its host environment is the infinite cosmos, where all are in a continuing motion and processes of change. As the ” original ” environment, before and after all derivatives (material or otherwise), is the cosmos, and an infinite ‘ being ‘ , anything which derives from the cosmos neither reduces nor increases its infinite being.

    It follows, an infinite resource can host an infinite number of ‘ constructs ‘ , AND, in the context of material lives, every individual life could reside in ITS OWN environment, aka, reality !

    This opens ones thinking/imagination to a most fertile bed of possibilities, and consider what our dreams are when we know (at least some of us know), God and Jesus, among others, do, from time to time, convey messages to an individual, and in the context, in so much as I suppose, of those being purely personal, intimate, and private.

    Furthmore, from my own experiences, in the state I name ” the mystic ” , messages, diabolical offers, prior-knowledge awareness, supernatural powers, etc are conveyed via the mind’s eye and hearing, when in an awake, conscious state.

    ~ ~ ~

    Now, if one considers the seemingly overwhelming issues of moral right and wrong, and justice for all the victims, both directly and indirectly injured, and across all future generations, and the mitigating factors for offenders, and across their ancestory etc, wouldn’t it be useful, considering many offenders assert a most terrible anti-social character, that they be confined themselves alone to a unique reality.

    A dark idea I know, and I don’t want to go any further with this, yet, if we suppose life’s God to be a purely Loving persona, and the provider of ALL ” good ” things, doesn’t it follow God would never harm any life, but only deny its good things to those offenders, for a limited time ( as, in the limited, finite material realties, all offending behaviours are also limited, as are all moral ” debts ” to the ” cosmic society of all life ” ) ?

    Important to remember : Logic itself does not require fact, only premise, and when that premise is false, all logical conclusion is also false. When such conclusions are used as premise for further reasoning, complex falsehoods/delusions are formed.

    buh-buy for now (^.^)

    Posted by Gregory | 27 December, 2013, 4:49 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Archives

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: